Welsh Newspapers
Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles
5 articles on this Page
1 SOUTH WALES.
1 SOUTH WALES. REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF INQUIRY. To THE MOST EXCELLENT ;)LUESTY. May it please your Majesty,-ln execution of the duty in- trusted to us by your Majesty's commission, we assemLled al Carmarthen on the 25th day of October last. We proceeded at once to announce publicly the purport of the commission with wuich we were charged, and we solicited informal ion from all classes of persons as to the causes of the prevailing discontents, liaving occupied ourselves during three weeks in taking, evi- dence. and in the general prosecution of our inquiries, we re. moved. lo iIav.furùwest, for the purpose of examining into the state of Pembrokeshire. At this period tbe excitement which had prevailed respecting turnpike gates had'in a sjrenl degree exhausted itself. The greater number of the g-ates which had been putl10wn bv acts of violence h1d not been re-erected those which had heed so were guarded by the police and by a military force. Several gates, indeed, remained in their usual slate, which, from some accidental circumstances connected willi their position, hud not become objects of attack. We were informed, however, that tbe people, having once felt their power, and undertaken to redress tueir own grievances, had, in some instances, combined for the purpose uf regulating (he tenure of land; threatening notices had been sent, and more luan one inctndiary fire had taken p1ace in cases in which landhrJs had made arrangements for uniting, in one taking, tenements whicb had for.TIerly been held s<,parate. Having finished our inquiries ill Pembrokeshire, we proceeded, successively, iato the counties of Cardigan and Radnor. In the former comity an anxious and discontented feeling was said still to prevail, though the disposition 10 commit acts of outrage and violence, which, but a short time before our arrival, had prevailed to so great an extent, was at tbat moment beld in check bv the presence of a military force. Great excitement, nevertheless, contiuuèd to exist; Urge assemblies of farmers and others took place in the davlime, at which speeches of an iui!.i!nmatory cha- racter were made, and resolutions, in a similar spirit, agreed to. In the western part of Radnorshire several gates fwd been re. cently de^ro\ed and in tue town of Rhayader the presence botb of policemen and soldiers wis found necessary to support the col- lection of the tolls at the gates which had ueen suusequently reo established. Irt the eastern part of Radnorshire a deep feeling of dissatis- faction as to tbe operation of tbe road laws was found to exist amongst the occupiers of land, but no outrages of importance had occurred in thai part of the county. In Erecol/shire, to which we next proceeded, we found Il1al the tranquillity of the coonty had been scarcely at all disturbed. All tbe turnpike, roaùs in Breconshire are comprehended in one Act of Parliament, and the tf1.1stees, whell di,1 uruances took place in the adjoining county of Carmarthen, carefully examined into the circumstances of their trust, and tue position of their gales; and, Laving done so, resolved on the removal of seven of them. It appears 1hat, by this proceeding, they had cbecked the tendency to commil acts of violence. The wealthy and populous county of Glamoqan was the last to "hich our investigations were extended. After visiting in SIlC. cession the principal towns in that cOt1nt.v. and communicating with persons of various classes and descriplions, we terminated our inquiries at Merthyr-Tvdvil on the 13th day of December. It is matler of great satisfaction to state our belief Ihat the dis- turbances of the country, though 1\0 widely extended, were not connected with political causes, and that nothing like a general spirit of disaffection, or organized hostility to the laws, pervaded the community. The excitement having been first stimulated bv a sense of local grievances, gradually spread to other districts in which sim.i1ar complaints existed, and the spirit, once roused, wits penerted in some instances by evil-disposed persons to ag- gressions of a more extensive and sJsternalic kind. It appeared, generally, that the chief grounds of complaint were tbe mismanageme"I of the funds applicable to turnpike- roads, the frequency and the amount of the payment of tolls, and, in some cases, the vexatious conduct of loll collectors, and the illegal demands made by them: the inerease in the amount pay- able for tithe under the Tithe Commutation Act, the unequal dis- tribution of the rent charges, and the variable payments, fluctu- ating with tht:" average prices of corn: the operation of Ihe Poor Law Amendment Act, principally (though not exclusively) 00 account of the high salaries of the officers, and the operation of the bastardy clauses the administration of justice by the local magistrates, and espesially the amount of the fees paid to their clerks, and the progressive increase of the county-rate. The cost and difficulty of recovering small debls, with some minor points of grievance and complaint, were pressed on our atteution, some of which it will be our duty to notice before we close our report As in tbe district we were examining the system of collecting tolls tor the improvement and maintenance of the turnpike. roads bad long beeo in operation, and had b<:en acquiesced in here as well as elsewhere, we were anxious to ascertain what the circum- stances were whicb had induced the country people suddenly to rise and endeavour to "hake ofF tbe burden. All persons ac- quainted with the condition of the country concurred in stating tbat a succession of wet and unproductive harvests had very much reduced the capital of tbe farmers. They hall heen forced, during successive years, to bay the bread consumed in their families and the mone, they obtained hy the sale of stock, and the other produce of tneir farms, scarcely enabled them to make good various payments to which they were liable. I Concurrently with these difficulties, tue price of sheep, cattle, and butter, had fallen much below the averRge uf preceding years, j though, at the same time (as it is said) all rales, tithes, and taxes had increasad, the rent of land still remaining, generally, undiminished. The Welsh, farmers are, at all times, a frugal, cautious race, but by tlie pressure of the circulDsl3nces we have described, they were rendered more than usually anxious to release themselves from even the smallest payments. Other circumstances, concurrent in point of time, though of altogether a different character and origin, tended not only to in. crease the total amount collected at the turnpike-gates, but had rendered Ibe mode of collection more stringent and vexatious than it bad been not many Jears before. By the General Highway Act, 5 and 6 William IV., cap, 56, the introduction of a new principle seems to have been contem- plated respecting turnpike. road,. they were, by clause 113, withdrawn from the operation of tbe iTighway laws. It appears that the intention of the framers of that measure was, that the trustees of turnpike-roads should raise money by way of lolls sufficient to pay tbe interest of toe debts, and to keep tue roads in repair. In order to accomplish (his object tolls had been, in many cases, increased in amount; payments had been rendered more fre. quent, ¡¡ide.bars multiplied, and ever, lawful means resorted to by the trustees to nphold the revenues of theIr respecllve trusts. Another alteration had taken place, also, which appears to bave bad a share in producing tbe feeJiog which led to the destruction of the gates. Mr. Stacev, the clerk to the main trust iu Carmar- thenshire, informed us that of late years the gates had been rented b, a different clau of persons-tbe, had been taken by people from a distance (professional toll-renters), and the effect had been to augment the trost funds; and, of course, to exact more from the public. The collection had been," he said, very lax before they did not exact the utmost futhiog-now, I tuink, they do." It appears that the practice had previously been common to give credit to tbe farmers, and to aliow them to compound for the tolls on comparatively easy lerms. The new collectors, however, having a higher rent to make up, declined, for obvious reasons, to afford the same accommodation. There can be no doubt, ItS we shall have frequent occasion to remark, that the pressure occasioned hy tbe continual demands for money out of pocket during a period of great depression in the couotrv, suggested the first attempt to get rid of some of the mo*t obnoxious burdens by force. .It is important also to state, with reference to the prevailing discontent, that partly from the defective state of tbe law, partly from the imperfect knowledge of its provisions, whicr. must neces- sarily prevail amongst a people who are ignorant of tbe language jn which it is written, many practices had been resorted to for the exaction of tolls which no law can be found to justify. Tbe resistance to the payment of tolls, and the destruction of turnpike-¡.{ates, beg-an in the Wbillilnd Trust, il. the confines of tbe collI/ties of Pembroke and Carmarthen. This trust wa, established in 1791; tbe Act was subsequently renewed, and several parish roads were then included which had not been named in the original Act. One of these roads (nearly eight miles in length), leading frQm St. Clear's to Maesgwvnne gate, had been made and upbeld in gaud eondition hv the parishes. The trustees did not, on Ihe passing of the Act, take the road into their charge, or provide tor ils management and repair it con- tinoed for several years 10 be maintained as a parish road. when suddenly the trustees resolved to place turnpike-gates at each end of it. •' In tbe year 1839," says Mr. Baugh Alleu, some people from England, for the first time, gave intimation that if cerlain new gates were erected on roads where considerable lime and culm traffic passed, they might be inducell to Lum the tolls at a higher rate than that wuich had been previously obtained. Their propo- sition was aceepted lhe tolls were let to Mr. Bullin, an extensive toll-contractor, and four Ðew gates were erected. But the country people, thinking it wrong that the trustees should take tolls where they had incurred no expenditure, assembled in the midst of ¡¡ummer, at about 6 o'clock in the afternoon, and those gates were pulled down amidst all sorts of noise, and dill urbaoce. and great jollity, and were destroyed without the interference of anybody." I do not think," says Mr. W. Evans, the clerk of this lrust, '• they were a week standing." The trustees gave notice of their intention to re-erect the gates. A meeting was held for tile purpose at St. Clears, but at that meeting a number (from 30 to 40, as it is said) of Ihe leading magistrates of the county of Carmartben qualified to act as trus- tees. and they deeided, by a large majority, lhat the gates should not be re-erected. This act of!he magistrates," says a very intelligent witness, '• gave satisfaction to tbt: country for a time, but it strengthened the hands of the discontented, and, in some measure, prepared them for furtiTer violence. The trustees continued to call upon the parishes to repair the roads, without laying out anything upon them themselves, though the income ofthe trust amounted to 500/. a-vear, which made the matter more galling." The rioters, however, gained their poiot, the gates were not re-established; no one wu punished for the outrage which had taken place, and there can be no doubt (as we are assured oy Mr. W. Evans), that with the erection ofthase gåtes originated the disturbance." A very strong opinion appears to have prevailed of mismanage- ment in the Whitland Trust amongst tbe persoQS resident withio its limits, There have heen," says Mr. Baugh AHen, "one or two very fraudulent surveyors on the road. The trust got into considerable confuslOlI by what IS called an improvement, about the year 1835; it was enlereJ upon at a time when I thillk the trustees were not justified in entering IIItO It: a large sum of money was laid out in compensation for land I should say thdt improvement (which afler all was worth nothing) cost 600/. A principal cause of dissatiMàctiun has heen, that wll/le those tolls have been in existence tbe roads have been very indifferent nothing has been given to lhe farmers for stones, and a very ina- dequate sum indeed laid out from tue trust funds upon the repair of the turnpike-roads." This trust comprehends 63 miles of road, of which it repairs 56, .-even mile" continuing to be parish road. The tolls were let in 1312 lor 377 I. 19s., which sum was collected at ten gates and olle ùu. The bonded debt amounted to 4,3521 bearing interest at 3t per cent., and there appears to have been an arrear of interest ( probably of no long standing) of 8411. 13s. We were informed by Mr. Evans, that an attempt had beeu maú.: by the trustees to satisfy the persons to whom this arrear was llue, by an immediate payment of one-third of the amount, and there Wall reason to believe that tbe greater part of the cre- ditors would willingly accede to these term". At the time of our inquiry 110 one gate or bar was left standing, and tbe receipt of tolls on account of tbe trust was altogether suspended. That which happened to the Whitland Trust had occurred in Ii greater or less. decree in every other trullt io Carmarthenshire, to 80me ot those III Pembrokeshire, and ill tbe south district of Car- diganshire. The most extensive destruction of the turnpike-gates had taken place in the roads which run north and south. Coal and lime abound in tbe southern ponion of Carmarthenshire and Pem- brokeshire; on the nortb the yare altogether wanting, and these minerals are carried to great distances (40 or 50 miles) into the adjoining count, of Cardigan. Small carts with narrow wheels are used for the purpose, drawn by two or three small hoises. Flom east to west the main line of communication is with lhe Dockyard at Miiford Haven and tue town of Haverfordwest, amI tbe traffic upon those roads is, from its character and description, better aole to sustain the pressure of the tolls. There are twelve different trusts in the county of Carmarthen, Ia each of these trusts tbe amount of the toU to be taken at tacb gate is limited by Act of Parliament, but there is no limit as to the frequency of the gates. We know no reason why the trustees should not, if they thought fit, in virtue of the large and lavish powers committed to them. establish a gate and demand a toll at intervals of 100 yards each throughout the county of Carmarthen, In the creation of each one of these trusts Parliament has paid no apparent regard to the existence of any other trust, and though the trustees have been somewhat unwilling to establish too frequent tolls within the limits of their respective districts, they have had no scruple in placing a jate or bar at the confines ot their own trust, however near ir mi^lit be to the gate of an adjoining one. In Carmarthen- shire the Kidwelly, and the Three Commotts Trusts, and some others, inteHace each other ill a sort uf network, and Ihe fre- quency of payments, which has ùeen so violently complained of and resisted, has chiefly arisen from that circumstance and whilst each trust retains the powers which have been given to it hy the Legislature, there is no mode of enforcing a remedy for th:s evil. ° '= The perplexity and pressure which are produced by the entan- glement of these trusts, have been still further aggravated by the relative position of other contiguous trusts. There are, for in. stance, five different trusts leading into the lown of Carmarthen, and it was stated by the clerk of one of these, that any one passing through the town i;1 a particuhr (1ircc:ion, would have to pav at three turnpike-gates in a distance of three miles. It would be easy for liS to multiply instances of a like frequency of payments we trust, however, that it will be sufficient for us to refer to the statements of Mr. Chambers and others, which will be found in the minutes of (,\li,lence. In carrying out the provisions of their respective Acts, the trustees are under little or no control. They interpret the law, and act upon it. very mud, as tliev think fit, and there is no ap- peal from their decisions. The cierks are required to make out an annusl account, and 10 return it to the clerk of the peace and, imperfect and adequate as this retorn is. Ihe evidellce before us shows that it has produced a salutary effect. It is certain that before that return was required, the accounts of the trusts were in much greater perplexity than they have been since. The detailed examination which we gave into the management of each trust. separately, led us to the conclusion, that if there had been some negligence, some ahuse, and some defiance (either wilful or igno- rant) of statute law, there had been much personal sacrifice, both of time and money, on the part of many individuals, and occa- sional manitestaiions of zeal and public spirit in carrying out the improvement of the roads. It is evident, indeed, that the embar- rassments in which the trusts are now involved, have arisen, in a great degree, from undertaking improvements beyond the extent of their means. The main trust runs east and west from Brecon- shire through Carmarthenshire into the county uf Pembroke. The trustees had been able, for a series of years, to pay the in- terest of the debt, and to keep the road in repair. In 1824, a wish arose to improve the communication between London and Waterford, and to accelerate the conveyance of the mails. Mr. Telford was employed by the Government to survey the road; and, though the object of this improvement was, as we were in- formed by Mr. Stacey, the clerk of the trust, rather a general object for the welfare of the United Kingdom, than for the benefit of Ihe county of Carmarthen, the Iruslees undertook to adopt the plan and to carry it into effect An estimate was made of the cost of eWecting tbe improvement, hy a person employed by the trust. He proved either ignorant or dishonest, and that which he led the trustees to believe could be done for 8,000/ was left unfinished and useless, after an expenditure of 12,000[. Of this sum 3,OOOL was already in hand when Ihe work was undertaken a further sum was borrowed from the Exchequer Loan Commissioners. W hen involved in this difficulty, a power was obtained from Par. liament to borrow 7 .500/. more, and to charge it on the revenue of the Post-office, by an additional postage on letters carried by tbat route 10 Ireland, froUl which both principal and interest are now in the course of gradual repayment. But this trust, though at no distant period in a prosperous condition, was, by these ex- ertions, placed in difficulties. The trustees, as we were informed by Colonel RiceTrevor, put up a new gate, called Ihe Mermaid gale. It was leased wilh others, but by some oversight the trustees omitted to direct that a pHmellt at this gate should free Ihe gale five miles off lit Car- marthen. Discontent was created, and the gate was five times in succession pulled down by a lawless mob. The spirit of improvement, which Involved the main trnst in _dilliculties, has produced a like effect on (he Newcastle and Car. mart,en trust, which cumprehelllls the important communication belwel:nll10se towns. "I underlook to says Mr. Lloyd Davies, a renewal of Ihe Act of Parliament, giving power 10 makt; a new line of road from Carmarthen to Conwvl, Ihe esti- mated cost of which had been 10,000/. I measured the work, with II common road surveyor, and undertook that it should be done for 3,500/. I got the Ac: passed ror 95[. I applied to the Loan-oflice, and got the 3,5001. The load was completed for 3,0001. The remaining 500/. was laid out to improve an old branch leading 10 Llanpumpsaint." No one seemed to undervalue the importance of the improve- ment effected hy these exertions and by this outlay, but the toll had heen raised from 3d. to 4^d., in order to provide for the in- terest and sinking fund. This addiljonal toll was raised alike on the old roarls and the new ones. When the contagion of dis. content spread from its focus in the Whitland Trust, the inha- bitants of the parishes lying north and west of Carmarthen (who, from local position, were constrained to travel as heretofore over the old and billy road), were displeased at paving this increased toll on account of the new road, the henefir of which thev did not enjoy. Excitement prevailed, tumultuous assemblies took place, alld the gates, olle of which stood at tbe very entrance of the town of Carmarthen, were destroyed with lhe greatest wiolence and outrage. At the lime of our inquiry, out of nine gates esta. blished by the trust, three only were standing. Under these circumstances, the truslee. have restored some of the gates but, with a view to pacify the discontented, ihey have done that which the law does nnt authorize them to do—they have established a lower rate of toll on the old line of road than on the new; 4Jd. ahorse drawing a cart is demanded on one road 3d. only, under like circumstances, on the other. This trjst affords another example of the power which truslees oot unfrequenlly assume of nullifying or repudiating statute Iii". Certain roads are specified and included in the local Act of Parliament, bat the money at the disposal of the trustees being insufficient to maintain the road, it is made over to the parishes, and, by the mere fact of itbaudonmeut by the trustees, is held to become a parish road, and to cease to belong to the trust. The general statement wbich we now have made respecting the county of Carmarthen, illustrated by the particulars connected wilh the three important trusts to which we have adverted, is sufficient to convey what we believe would be an accurate im- pression of Ihe origin of Ihe discontent whicb exis'ed in Carmar- thenshire, and the immediate causes of the outrages which have taken place. If the duty intrusted to us were confined to the exposition of sach causes only, what we have already said respecting that COunt, might be deemed sufficient; bot, as we are also required to suggest such amendments in Ihe laws respecting roads as may appear to us to be necessary or desirable, we hold it to be in- cumbent upon os to set forth in detail soch particulars respecting the state and management of each particular trust as must, we think, be deliberately considered before the just or proper mode of dealing with such trust can he decided on. The facts, indeed, which it will be our dntv shortly to notice, will be deduced from the evidence, aud may be foand at length in the minutes annexed but it will tend, we think, to facilitate the objects we have in view, if we enter upon the statements we are now about to make before we set forth the conclusions to which we have arrived. ( To be continued).
CARMARTHENSHIRE SPRING ASSIZES.
CARMARTHENSHIRE SPRING ASSIZES. (Continued from our la,t.J THWRSDAY, MARCH 21.-Thoma., v. Lewis and another.— In this ease, Mr. V. Williams and Mr. Richards appeared for the plaintiff; and Mr. Chilton, QC., and Mr. Nicholl Came for the defendants. The action was brought by the plaintiff, Mr. James Thomas, solicitor, Llandilo, against two parties, named Lewis Lewis and Thomas Lloyd, the former as the acceptor of two bills of exchange, amounting to about 671., and the latter as his security. The effect of the defendant's pleas were—payment, and a set off—to make out which Mr. Chilton first addressed the jury, and adduced evidence for the defendants. It appeared that, in 1842, the defendant, Lewis, made a sale, and the plaintiff undertaking to collect the pro. ceeds, paid him a sum of money, amounting to upwards of thirty pounds, on account, for which and the interest, at the rate of about 25 per cent., the defendant gave a promissory note. Another note was subsequently given, hoth making up the sum sought The defendants contended that they were in a position to prove that plaintiff had received more than the amount of both notes from the produce of the sale. A great number of witnesses were examined, to prove the payments to plaintiff of various sums, for purchases made by them at the defendant's sale but though they proved payments to the amount of the promissory notes, the Court held that sufficient payments to cover the notes and the interest had not been made out. A long argument ensued between the Learned Judge and Counsel on both sides, but as the action involved no point of public interest, it is unnecessary to enter into de- tails. The jury, by his Lordship's direction, returned a ver- dict for the plaintiff for 71. 6s 2d., with leave to move for a verdict for defendants, should the Court above be of opinion that there was evidence to warrant it. On some counts a verdict was entered for the defendants. Attorney for plaintiff, himself; for defendant, Mr. Jeffries, Carmarthen. FRIDAY.—This morning, the Learned Judge took his seat on the bench at nine o'clock. The Court, from an early hour, was extremely crowded, in consequence of the trials of several parties upon charges of Rebecca riots and burglary. Thomas Powell, John James, Evan Davies, David Evans, Thomas Thomas, John 1 homas, and John Thomas were placed at the bar, on a charge of havmg, on the 12th of August last, at the parish of Llanfihangel-ar-arth, burglariously entered the house of one Daniel Harris, and stealing therefrom various sums of money. In other counts of the indictment, they were charged with assaults on various persons, and in others with having riotously, unlawfully, and tumultuously assembled, and creating a great noise, riot, and disturbance against the peace of our Sovereign Lady the Queen, her Crown, and dignity. Datid Thomas was also charged with being an accessory before the fact. The names of two other persons (not in cus- tody) were also in the calendar. Messrs. Chilton, Q.C., Evans, Q C., and E. V. Williams ap. peared for the Crown. Mr. Richards defended the prisoners David Eruns, Datid Thomas, and John Thomas. The others were undefended by Counsel. Mr. Chilton, Q.C., addressed the jury on behalf of the Crown. May it please your Lordship, Gentlemen of the Jury,—The prisoners at the bar are indicted—seven of them as principals, and David Thomas as an accessory before the lact-for one of the most heinous crimes known to the law—the crime of burglary and, gentlemen, before I pro- ceed to state facts, which will be adduced in evidence, I will observe, that I think it highly probable that, from the circumstance of the great publicity which has been given, and is invariably attendant upon offences of this description, and from the circumstance of myself and my Learned Friends appearing to conduct the prosecution on behalf of th.e Crown, that you are fully aware that this charge is, in some degree, mixed up with the gross outrages which have lately disgraced the country, under the name of Reboccaisin. Were this an orciuary case of that description, I should, in the performance of my duty, feel it incumbent upon me to can ion you against those feelings which it is natural, and in some points of view excusable, that men moving in your stations in life should entertain for I will not attempt to deny bnt that iheie may have been heavy bnrdens which the agricultural population may have, for a length of time, endured, and which it may be difficult for them to endure longer. I can make considerable allowances for this kind of feeling, but, gentlemen, in this case it will be my duty to lay before yon one of the most melancholy instances of the great evil of listening to that most dangerous—most seductive doctrine, of "doing evil that good might come"—of doing that which in itself is wrong and vicious for the purpose of producing some real or imaginary good. In ordinary cases, the evils of Rebeccaiam may have this extenuation, though it cannot for a moment be considered either a justification or an excuse, that they have violated the law for the pur- pose of suppressing and extinguishing some reat or supposed public grievance bnt, gentlemen, so long as human nature is human nature, and so long as the feelings and passions of humanity are what they are, when once the law is set at defiance, there will, as disclosed in a former case, false Re- beccas arise, and take advantage of the prevalence of lawless violence, and pervert those feelings for the accomplishment of private pnrposes-either to satisfy private malignity and spite, or, what is worse, private cupidity and love of lucre, as I fear has been the case in the charge before us. There- fore, so far from calling upon you to guard yourselves against feelings in favour of Rebeceaism, I shall callupolI yon to exercise the greatest care and caution before you convict either of the prisoners at the bar, to see that the charge is fully proved, and clearly bronglr home to them. As to the commission of the offence, and its commission under circum- stances which certainly admit of no excuse or extenuation there rannot possibly arise the slightest doubt. Having made those fcw observations, I shall now give von fl brief out- line of the proceedings out of which has originated the pre- sent elnrge. The house which was broken open and en- tered on the llili of August last, belonged to a very old man of the name of Daniel Harris, who had no more to do with turnpike-gates or turnpike tolls than yon, the gentlemen of the jury or myself. He had to pay them, but with that ex- ception he tva* in no other way connected with them. He resided—I say resided, for I must tell yon that these out- 'ages and violence were such—I will not tell vou that they hastened his death, but, at all events, he is now no more, and I shall he obliged to put his written testimony in evidence against the prisoners. He resided on a faim called Pantyfen Issa, in the parish of LhinfihatigeUrai th, in this county, and, at the time of the outrage, the old man's wife, daughter, his son-in-law, a boy, and a Servant named Mary Titus, were the only inmates of the house. It is beyond doubt, that in the dead of night, during the night of the llth of August last, they were aroused from their beds bv a disguised mob, armed with fire-arm*, reaping-hooks, bludgeons, and other implements, and who commenced violently beating the door, demanding admittance in the most intimidating manner, and by (heir threats compelled the inmates to open the door. That they were compelled to open the door by intimidation could not he denied, when, as you shall hear from the wit. nesses, they were told bv the armed mob that they would not wait long for them." Having been admitted, they en. tered the house to the number of eleven or twelve, and in. quired if the oldman had received a letter from Rebecca. I believe his son-in-law answered that he had not, when one of the mob replied that he had received more than one; they then demanded the sum of 201. for a woman named Gwenllian Lewis. The old man told them that he had got but a sovereign and a shilling in the house. They then de- sired the son-in-law to procure them a candle, and Mary Titus, the servant, having lighted one, ran upstairs and hid under the bed. She could therefore give them no further account of the transaction. They searched the house, but could find no more lhan the 1/. Is., which they compelled old Harris to deliver up. One of the mob then drew a ready written stamped promissory n ite for 20Z. from his pocket, and insisted upon the old man signing ii for this Gwenllian Lewis; they also insisted upon his son-in-law signing it as a security. This note they compelled them to sixn, armed with guns and pistol. Having given them the money, the old man told them they had taken all he had got, that he not even a farthing to buy tobacco, upon which the one shilling was returned to him. You shall hear from the witnesses the enquiries made respecting the time the note became payable, and other details. I have already told yon that the mob were not only armed, hut that they were all disguised. In- deed, they were so much so, that the inmates of the house do not affect to identify any of them. To prove these facts, I shall call before you James Davies, (he son-iu-taw.and Mary Titus. I cannot cat) the wife, in consequence of her infir- mities, but of these facts there can be no doubt. The next question that arisen is, how do I affect the prisoners at the bar. In the first place, it will be my duty to call before yon two accomplices. They will tell you that the pi isoner, David Thomas, who is charged with being an accessory before Ihe fact, was the piime mover and instigator of the whole trans- action. The prisoners first assembled at the house of David Thomas, on the night of the 10th of August, having intended making the attack on that night. But owing to circumstances whichwiH appear by the evidence, they did not make theattack on that night, but met again on the 11th at the house of the prisoner, David Thomas. There they disguised themselves, and went and did that which has been briefly detailed to yon. The witnesses will describe to you the part taken by each of the prisoners in the affairs of the night, though I will tell you, under the direction of his Lordship, that it is not neces- sary to prove what each prisoner did for if it will be proved that they went out together wilh one common purpose, they are all equally guilty. Now, Gentlemen, his Lordship will tell you, that you cannot with safety rely upon the evidence of an accomplice, unless his evidence be corroborated in some material points by the evidence of untainted witnesses, who have not participated in the crime. Now. gentlemen, how do I corroborate their testimony ? In the first place, I shall show you the motive which had actuated the prisoner, David Thomas, throughout the whole transaction. The money was demanded from the old man pretendedly for Gwenllian Lewis. In fact, you will find that David Thomas had a kind of smattering in law. On the 25th of July, 1842, he entered into an agreement with Gwenllian Lewis, for the purchase of a supposed claim which she had upon Daniel Harris. He (prisoner) was to give her 13L, free of all ex- penses, for the amauntof her claim, which was considerably more; but he was not to pay the 13/ until he had got the sum claimed from old Harris. Now I conclude, from the circumstance of no proceedings having been taken from 1S42 to August, 1843, as he did not go to law, that he found the claim was not good bnt in the meantime Rebecca had arisen, and he made use of the terrors of Reheccaisni to en- force a clainr which he could not do by the law of the land. The son-in law will pro, e that he saw one letter upon the subject in the possession of the old man, Harris. In addi- tion to that, it will be proved by David Lewis, who will be called, that the prisoner, David Thomas, offered him 11. if he would go that night to Pantyfen, bringing with him a pistol, a sword, or any other implement. He made some excuse, and did not go. I will also state, that another wit- ness was offered 8s. by David Thomas, for going to the same place. Another witness, John Jones, whose conduct I cannot commend as being entirely free from blame, yet who cannot be considered or treated as an accomplice, ac- tually went to Thomas's house on the night of the 10th, and sawall the prisoners at the bar there. After they had dressed themselves in disguise, he told them that ^e had seen a person on the road who would be a likely party to give information to Mr. Price, the Magistrate, if he saw them. In consequence of that intimation, it was agreed that they should meet and proceed to Pantyfen on the next night, the 11th. David Thomas then said—for it was often found that the ringleader shrunk from the danger—"I will not go with yon, but shall show myself at Blaenpant, that Morgans might be a witness that I had nothing to do with the matter." There are, Gentlemen, many other facts con- nected with the case, which I have thought it unnecessary to state, but which yon shall hear from the witnesses. You shall also hear a confession which has been made by one of the prisoners, John Thomas, of Blaeurhidian but that you cannot consider as evidence against anv of the other pri- soners. You shall also hear the statement of a witness, to whom David Thomas gave an account of the proceeding. He told him much of what had taken place, and added, that he thought they had acted too leniently-that he should again go there himself, and compel the old man to pay them 401. in cash. He had, ere that, discovered that a promissory note, obtained under such circumstances, could not be worth a penny, and that any idea of enforcing it would be futile. In point of fact, he did go to Pantyfen, but as that will be the subject of another prosecution, I forbear dwelling upon it. There is one circumstance connected with the prisoner, David Evans, that he fled the country; vigilant search had been made before he was discovered. He was, however, subsequently found concealed under a rug. I do not reo quest you to give that circumstance more than its due weight. I believe I have given you an outline of the most prominent features of the case. You will attend and watch the evi- dence, and see that the charge is clearly brought home be- fore you convict, and I am confident youi verdict, whatever it may be will give satisfaction to the country. James Davies examined by Mr. Evans:—I am the son-in- law of the late Daniel Harris, of Pantyfen. I lived with him in August last. He is since dead. He died on the 5th of January last. Pantyfen is in the parish of Llanvihangel-ar- arth. 1 remember the night of the 11th of August, being the night before the Carmarthen August fair. 1, my wife, and father-in-law slept at Pantyfen on the night in question. Mary Titus and a boy also slept in the bouse. We were dis. turbed about twelve o'clock that night. We had retired to bed about nine or ten o'clock. I, my wife, and the old man slept in the same room. We were disturbed by strange peo- ple beating the doors and calling out. We were very much alarmed, and I rose and opened the door. After 1 opened the door, they said they required money for Gwenllian Lewis. Before I opened the door, they told me to open it in five minutes, or they would destroy the old man's property. It was a fine moonlight night. On opening the door, I saw a number of people, about ten or twelve, strangely disguised their faces weie painted. I cannot describe their dresses, as I was too much alarmed. They told me that they had sent two 'Becca letters to the old man. Several of them came to the house, there being two of them with guns, one with a pistol, and another with a sword. They said they wanted money for Gwenllian Lewis. There was one who had a red coat. My father-in-law got up, and came to the passage. He said he harl not such a sum of monpy in the house, for they had then named 20/. as the sum required. The old man had said he had only 1/. Is. in the house. They ordered me to light a caudle. They said, if I would not they would destroy the things. I called on Mary Titus totightaeandtc; she did so, and then went up-stairs. One of the men then pulled out of his pocket a ready-written note for 20L., After reading it, he requested the old man to sign it. He did so. They then said that I must sign it. Those who had guns, &c., stood at this time each side of the door. My father-in-law said he required two months to pay. One man said he should have three months to pay. The old man requested them to write the time he was to pay it. One of them tuen wrote something on the hack of the note. Harris asked where he was to pay the money. One of them said into Morris's Bank. Another told him to pay it into Wilkins's Bank. The old man had the shilling back, to pay for a quarter of tobacco, after he had paid them the sovereign and the shilling. The mob remained in the house for about half-an-hour. Cioss-examined by Mr. Richards 1 can wiite, but that night I only put my mark to the note. My father-in-law likewise only put his mark. The undefended prisoners put the witness no question. John Lloyd Price, E-q., is a Magistiate for the county- look the examination of Daniel Harries, in the presence of the prisoners. The examination of Daniel Harries was taken ill Welsh, and translated into English. After it was written, it was explained to deceased witness the second time. He signed it by attaching his mark to it. By the Court:—The prisoners were taken into custody, and brought before me by warrant, in consequence ofinfor. mation received after the outrage. Daniel Harries had given witness information of the outrage, and in three or four months time one of the accomplices informed against several of ihe prisoners whom the police, by the direction of witness, apprehended. • Cross-examined by Mr. Richards :—The party who gave me information, first gave evidence voluntarily, but under- standing that he had been tampered with, I sent for him. I do not remember whether the proclamation offering re- wards for the destruction of gates and houses bv fire was then published. I did not offer the informant any monev. Cross-examined by John Thomas I never promised" to keep the prisoner sate and give him work if he would make the same statement as Evan Davis. Re-examined by Mr. Chilton, Q.C.: — [Handing a written statement to witness.] John Thomas made the confession contained in this paper. I did not offer hiin a reward, or held out a threat or anvthing else. Cross-examined —Prisoner made the confession before Mr. Prytherch, myself, and the Cleik, Mr. Spurrell. He made it voluntarily, as he wished to become Queen's evi- deuce. Daniel Prytheroh, Esq., was called, said he was present when prisoner signed the confession. No threat or reward was held out to him. Mr. Richard Spurrel examined I am Clerk to the Ma- uistrates. I took the examination on the 23d of December, l'his witness corroborated Mr. Price's evidence as to the mode adopted in taking the examination. The. examination of Daniel Hariis, the deceased, was then put in, but ihe Court objected to it, as it had not ap. peared by the evidence that the prisoners were present when it was taken. Mr. Price was recalled to prove this circumstance. The examination of the deceased was then put in, and translated to the prisoners. It was in substance the same as that given by his son-in-law, the first witness called. The confession of the prisoner, John Thomas, was then put ill and read. The deposition said that he had been in- duced to go there by the other pi isoner, his master— that j they went to Petilan, the house of one of the prisoners, and there disguised themselves. He then named the parties present, and described the weapons carried by each of the prisoners. Ptisoner himself cariied a gun.and the others various other arms, such as pistols, hooks, &c. The rest of his evidence corroborated the deposition of the deceased and his son-in-law's evidence. Mary Titns, the servant of the deceased Daniel Harris, of Pantyfen, was-then examined by Mr. Vaughau Williams.— She corroborated the evidence given in part, but not as to all the facts detailed, as she had retired up stairs as soon as the mou appeared. Evan Davies, one of the approvers, now gave evidence. He said that John Thomas, one of the prisoners, came to his house, requested him to go with him to Pantyfen, to get money. He said theie was an agreement between him and Gwenllian Lewis, that he was to raise 40t.-that he was to divide 5t. between the company. Witness assented. He went to the prisoner's (John Thomas's) house, on the 10th of that month—he went there about nine o'clock at night. There were several persons there- David Richards, Hether- tnelyn, John Thomas, Penlan, David Richards, David Evans, John James, of Groft, David Evans, of Penrhiwfach, John and Thomas Powell. John Thomas of Blanrhidian, and Thomas Thomas, of Cwniygor. There were more there who were not at the bar. There was a man named John Jones, a carpenter, there. We blackened our faces, and disguised ourselves that night. J can't say how far the house is from Pantyfen. It might have been 10 o'clock. They did not go to deceased's house that night, for David Thomas said they had better not go, as it was too late, and some person might tell Mr. Price, the magistrate. They agreed to go on the next night. David Thomas said, that as ) e was the most forward about the money, he had better not go, lest they should suspect him, but that he would show himself by going to Blaenpant, to buy a horse, and take Morgan with him as a witness to prove where he was on that night. On the llth, ihev again met at the house, and a number of persons, whom witness named [all who were there on the previous night with the exception of John Jones and David Thomas], then went to the house, and having blackened their faces and dis. guised themselves in various ways, commenced their journey. Witness was dressed in a gown, and the others in various dresses—John Powell in a red coat. David Thomas said he was going to Blaenpant. They then went, all on foot, and when near Glangwilly they met a person with a cart, and also saw some boys in a wood near Glangwilly. One of the party ran after the boys. David Evans had something like a bayonet. David Richards and John Powell carried guns. I do not know who carried the pistol. They arrived at Pantyfen, and knocked and kicked at the door, and threat- ened, if they did not open it, they would do some injury. A candle having been lighted, several of them went in. This accomplice's evidence corroborated the evidence of the residents of Pantyfen in every particular, and was very similar, with the exception of his describing the names of of the various prisoners who took part in the transactions of the night. Cross-examined:—1 did not go for the sake of getting a share of the 51. I was afraid of David Thomas. I was ex- amined before the Magistrates on the 7th Jannary, and in December. I think I told the Magistrates about 51" but am not quite sure that I did. [Mr. Richards then put in the witnesses depositions.] Examination continued :—One of the gnus was fired in Pantyfen yard. He had not drank anything before going, but on returning they drank a little beer at Pencader. They did no violence to the old man. David Richards, Llether- melyn, gave the old man the shilling, and the latter thanked him. He did not appear pleased. His (witness's)object in going to Mr. Price was, because he saw that the county was in a bad state—that there would soon be no order or law, and he was constantly troubled by his wife about it. I know Margaret Richards, Abergwilly. I never spoke to her about this business. I remember I am on my oath. I will swear, and swear an honest oath, that I never told her Mr. Price had offered 501. for informing. I know Benjamin Jones-I never spoke to him about this. Never said to Margaret Richards, if I knew Talog as well as she did I would inform against some one. I don't know Thomas Stephen. I never told him that I had money, and was subpoeued to give evidence against the prisoners, but that I had nothing to say against them but what one of the prisoners told me. [Mr. Richards here put in the depositions relative to a burglary alleged to have been committed by the same prisoners on the 22d, with a view of proving, that, in giving evidence le- lating to the second transaction, nothing relating to the first was mentioned by witness, but on reading the deposition it did appear that he had mentioned the former.] This wit- ness's examination and cross-examination lasted fortwo hours. John Jones examined —I am a carpenter living in Aber- gwilly. I know David Thomas, the prisoner. Saw him on Wednesday before the August fair at Carmarthen. He asked me to come with him to Pantyfen. I did not know where Pantyfen was. He said he wished to get money from Gwenllian. I said I did not like to go, but at last pro- mised to go. We were to meet at David Thomas, of Pen- lan's honse. He said he was not going himself. He went on that evening [the 10th], and named the persons who were present. They were the same as those mentioned by the last witness. All the prisoners were there besides two not in custody. Witness described the circumstance of their having blackened their faces and changed their dresses, but thinking it too late they left and agreed to meet the next night. They did so all with the exception of John Jones, of Caerphilly. He was not present on the second night. The evidence relating to the arms and weapons borne by each of the prisoners was precisely the same as, and corroboratoiy of, the other evidence. The description given of the conduct of the parties at Pantyfen was also the sametas that already given. Cross-examined by Mr. Richards :—The old man said that he owed nothing to Gwenllian. I never heard of the pro. clamation offering a reward before I gave the information. Never heard of Colonel Trevor's proclamation. Never told Mr. Benjamin Jones that Mr. Price, the Magistrate, had offered me 501, reward for informing. Re-examined: — Witness had been ill in bed from the time of the occurrence to the present time. John Jones, Derllvvyn, examined:—I remember hearing of people having been at Pantyfen. I was on that night by a wood near Glangwilly. There were two other boys with us. We saw about ten people walking on the road. This witness's evidence was deemed immaterial, and he was dis- missed. David Davies examined by Mr. Chilton, said that, on one occasion, the prisoner David Thomas requested him to go with him to Penlan to get 401. for a woman. Witness re- fused to go. He then wished to borrow two guns, which witness would not give. On Ihe following day, David Thomas told him they had been at Pantyfen, and had got ll. Is., and had given the old man one shilling back—that they had got the note signed. William Lewis examined, said, that in the beginning of August, the prisoner, David Thomas, requested him to go with him to Pantyfen, to bring a gun, pistol, and sword with him, and that he should have a sovereign. He also had asked him the Thursday previous to August fair. He did not speak about being armed on the second time. Told him first time he would go. The second time he requested me to go wilh him, and I said, no I would not. Esau Daniel examined:—Remembers previous to August fair that prisoner, David Thomas, requested him to ac- company him to Llanfihangel-ar-Arth, and would give him a share of 5t.. John Jones, Caerphilly, said, that at the request of John Thomas he went to the first meeting at his house. He named all the prisoners as being present, and twoolhers not in custody. They all disguised themselves but witness. He said that he would not go with them to Pantyfen, as he had seen David, of Bryn-amlwg, passing through the yard. David Evans was disguised in a stuff-cloak and bonnet. They left the house, and postponed going that night, and agreed to meet on the following night. Witness did not go that night. He refused to have anything to do with them. John Guy, of the A division of Metropolitan Police, examined: Had been a long time in search of David Evans. Went in January to his father's house. His sister denied his being in the house. On searching, he found him concealed. Edward Edwards, wascatted to prove his having seen the signature of David Thomas, the prisoner, and Gwenllian Lewis attached to an agreement. The agieement was read. It was one entered into between Thomas and the female, by which she agreed to sell the alleged legacy due from Daniel Harris to her for the sum of 131., and if he could nut recover it the agreement was to he void. John Davies proved that shortly before the outrage, John Thomas told him to go where they had been to before. Wit- ness understood he referred to their having been at Pantyfen. Prisoner said that they had dealt too leniently with the old man, and that they were going again, that he would go there himself, and make him pay in money. He asked witness if he would come? Witness said no. He asked if his son should come. Witness declined acceding to his request. He then said, I could procm e enough of men, if I could get hoises." At last witness consented to lend him a saddle. Mr. Chilton now announced that this was the case for the prosecution. Mr. Richards then addressed the jury for the three pri- soners, David Evans, David Thomas, and Thomas Thorn s, and in doing so he wished it to be understood, thai he per- fectly agreed with the observations made, with becoming solemnity, by the Learned Counsel (Mr. Chilton), who led for the Crown, on the attrocious enormities which had been lately committed in that county but he contended that neither of the three prisoners represented by him were pre. sent at the time alleged. There could be no doubt but that 1 a great outrage, as detailed in evidence, had been committed by some persons at Pantyfen, on the night in question, and he also agreed with his Learned Friend who represented: the Attorney-General, that, on this occasion, the outrage was one of a private nature, under the garb of public utility. Mr. Richards then commented upon the unreasonableness of the proceeding adopted to get the vole by David Thomas when he might have known that payment could never have been enforced. The Learned Gentleman then commented upon the whole of the evidence. He referred to the rp. wards offered hy Government, and attributed perjury to the vvitnesses for the prosecution. Having remarked at considerable length upon the evidence given for the prose- cntion, Mr. Richards proceeded to state that he would can evidence lo prove that David Evans was at a distance of miles off on the night in question, having called at the house of a friend at Soar, which is uine miles distant from Pantyfen. John Thomas, one of the prisoners, addressed the jury, and said that he had been in the same room in gaol as the witness Evan Davies for about an hour—tbat D ivies wished the prisoner to turn Queen's evidence, and state the same thing as he did, and that he should get a sha-e of the 50/. which Mr. Price had given him—that he hail got John Jones and another witness for the prosecution to swear the same tlr.ngss, and that he (pt isoner) said he did not like to tell mi truth about his neighbours, and that Mr. Price, the rnagis- trate, said he would be quite safe if he would inform; btit he would not do so, as he knew he had a soul. [This is the prisoner who milde the statement in confession to the Ma- gistrates], Evan Evans was then called as a witness to prove an alibi on behalf of David Evans. He swore that the prisoner called at his house on the night in question, to make arraii"e- ments abont going to Hereford. ° In cross-examination witness said, that he was the pri. soner's uncle, and he fixed the time so exactly, because ptÎsoner called at his house on the night previous to the fair at Carmarthen. Evan Jones said he called at Evan Evans's house on the night in question, and saw the prisoner there. This witness contradicted the last in one very mateiial point. Euock Jones was called to prove the same thing. Mary Evans was called for the same purpose. Margaret Richards, sister of David Richards, one of the parties charged (but not in custody) with being one of the burglars, gave e vidence to prove an alibi for Thomas Thomas. She at.o proved that Evan Davies, one of the prosecution witnesses, said that he had been offered 50/. for swearing about Pantyfen. Benjamin Jones was brought on to prove a similar thing. IMaiy Richards, the wife of one of the parties charged, hut since absconded, came to prove that one of the p o- secution witnesses made to her a statement, but whic.h bad been contradicted in cioss-examiuation by that witness. Several witnesses to character h ivjng been called, Mr. Chilton was in the act of replying, when the Judge intimated that, as the case had occupied the whole day, and would in all probability occupy some hours longer, the Court had better be adjourned. Accommodations for the night were then ordered to be provided for the jury, aud the Court was adjourned. SATURDAY—This morning the burglary case was pro- ceeded with.—Several witnesses were called to give the various prisoners good characters. Mr. Chilton then addressed the jury in reply. He com- menced by vindicating the characters of the witnesses for the prosecutions from the attacks made upon them by Mr. Richards. He was extremely sorry that in his defence his Learned Fiiend had found it necessary so indiscriminately to attack all the witnesses, from the Magistrates who per- formed their arduous duties so fearlessly during the late alarming state of the country, to the policeman who did his duties, and acted under the direction of the Magistrates. The Learned Gentleman then proceeded to point out the gross contradictions and inconsistencies ill the evidence of th" witnesses who were called to prove a/ibis, all of whom, with the exception of Benjamin Jones, were relations either of the prisoners, or of those who, being charged with the burglary, had absconded. Many of the discourses said to have been made use of about the proclamations, were stated to have taken place even before the rewards had been offered. Mr. Chilton then dwelt at considerable length upon the evidence of accomplices. It would be dangerous to convict upon the evidence of an accomplice, unless corro. borated in some important points by the evidence of nn. tainted witnesses. Such, he contended, was the case in this instance. The Learned Counsel for the defence had con- tended that it was extremely improbable that David Thomas should have committed himself into the confidence of so many persons as he was represented to have done; but it indisputably appeared that the offence had been committed by some people. Some persons had committed themselves into the power of so many people. Then came the questions, Who did so? Who had a motive for doing 807 He (Mr. Chilton) contended, that a strong motive was proved by the agreement entered into between the prisoner Thomas and Gwenllian Lewis—that the former should pay her 13l. in case he should, by any means, procure a larger sum from Daniel Harries, the deceased. How could the accomplices have known anything respecting that agreement, had they not been informed about it by the prisoner? But even set. ting aside their evidence, the guilt of the two Thomas's was proved by that of untainted witnesses. Mr. Chilton went over the whole of the evidence, and concluded a very now. erful address by entreating the jury to give the case that weight aud consideration which its importance deserved and give the prisoners the benefit of any reasonable doubts! The Learned Judge then summed up the evidence. The first question for the jury to consider was, whether an of- fence of the nature of that described by the witnesses had been committed. It was his duty to tell ibem that, if entrance was effected into a house by threat or intimidation, in law, it amounted to bnrglaty, though the door might have been opened not by force, but by its having been opened by the inmates of the house. However strong the evidence against David Thomas, as an accessory before the fact, might be, yet, if the others were not guilty, he could not be convicted, for he was charged with having abetted and procured them, and not other persons. His Lordship then directed the jury how to receive the evidence of accomplices. The law empowered juries to convict upon the evidence of accom- plices only, yet it was never safe to convict upon their evidence, nnless corroborated in some important points by other evidence given by untainted witnesses. His Lorrl- ship then read over the most important portions of the evi- dence, and contrasted the various parts corroborative of, or apparently inconsistent with, the rest of the evidence. The jury then .retired, and after about forty minutes ab. sence, returned a verdict of Guilty against all the prisoners. (Continued in our 3d page). DREADFUL SHIPWRECKS-TWENTY LIVES LOST.— Within the last few days the destruction of two fine Liver- pool ships has been reported at Lloyd's, namely, the Georgina, Captain Wilson (a barque), 227 tons, and the Caroline, Captain Jackson, nearly 600 tons, the amount of which losses is little short of 45,OOOl., and what renders the wrecks more painful is, that they were attended with the loss of up- wards of twenty lives. It appears that the Georgina left Liverpool for Arica in South America, with a general cargo, on Saturday last, a stiffish breeze blowing at the time. She, however, proceeded favourably until the following day, when she was driven with much force on to a dangerous shoal, called the Blackwater Bank, about nine miles to the North-east of Wexford, and as the vessel was fast sinking, a cry was raised "To the boats!" They were speediiy lowered, and the crew shoved off from the ill-fated barque, and used all their exertions to gain the tand; but as the surf was running tremendously strong, and the wind was equally boisterous, they were hurled bottom upwards as they approached the beach. Some of the unfortunate fellows tried to regain the boats; others attempted to swim ashore but out of the whole number, consisting of 14 persons, only two survived, W. Carren, chief-mate, and David M'Lean, seaman, the remainder, including the Captain, perishing amidst the breakers. The Georgina, subsequently foundered in 12 fathom water, and is a complete loss. She was the property of Mr. J. Worral, of Liverpool, and her loss is esti- mated at 30,OOOl.-The Caroline, a fine packet-ship, be. longed to Messrs. Wilson and Dawson, of Chapel Walk, Liverpool. She left that port in the early part of last week' with a general outward-bonnd cargo for Africa, her crew consisting of 20 persons. On her arrival off the Welsh coast, it came on to blow very hard, and Captain Jackson deemed It prudent to run for the Sludwell Roads for shelter. The gale increased from the W.N.W. with a tremendous tolling sea on, and after weathering for some time, she was driven on to the rocks on the western-most Sludwell Islands, and quickly went to pieces. The Captain and some of the un. fortunate fellows swam to the Islands, but were as soon swept off by the surf, and perished. The remainder of the crew saved themselves by the jolly and long boats, although in a most dreadful state of exhaustion.
BANKRUPTS from Tuesday's Gazette.
BANKRUPTS from Tuesday's Gazette. To Surre7lder in Ihtsinghall-street CHARLOTTE STAPI.ES. milliner, Southampton, March 28, May 3. Alia. Clement anil Newman, Southampton. JOHN EARI.Y RIDOUT, wool draper, Ritigwood, Southamptonsliire, April 4, May 2. Alt. Davy, Ringwoori. JAMBS DEACON, draper, Wlutecliapel road, March 2H, May 1. Atts. Heert ami Shaw, Pi iilay-streel, ClJeapSlde. HENRY COERTZ, upholsterer, New Windsor, Berks, March 30, April 30 All. liailon, New Windsor. To Surrender in the Country. MARY RAMSAY and RALPH RAMSAY, paper.inannVactnrers, Seofswoort, Northumberland, April L'j and "29, at the Newcaslle-upon Tyne lHatriet Court.11. Leadbitter, Slaple 1110. JOHN FINNEY, builder, Woore, Shropshire, March 27. April 29, at the Birmingham District Court. Att. Wairen, Market Diayton. jAMtiS HOWARTH, cot'on jpinner, Lee-Mill, Lancashire. Marrh 3O April n. at the Manchester OistlÎct Courl. Aus. Sale and \V orlhing lon, Manchester. GROIIGR H.RIHNG, grocer, Carlisle, April I, May t, at (he Newcastle- upon Tyne District Court. Alt. Hojte, Newcastle upon Tyne. WILLIAM PAGE WARD, «rocer, Liverpool, April 3 and 23, at ihe Liver, pool District Court. All. Booker, Liverpool. BANKRUPTS from Friday's Gazette. To Surrender in Uasinyhall street. WILLIAM CHAPMAN, surgeon, York place, New.road, April 2, May 3. Alts. Rickards anil Walker, Lincoln's Inn fields. JONATHAN GUNDRY, shoemaker, Hampstead, April 17, May 7. AUa. Pain and Co., Great Marlborough street. HENRY WILLIAM HEMSVVOIITH, wine merchant, Primrose street, HUhopsgate street, April 2, May 8. Atls. Pain and Co., Great Marl- borough sheel JOHN MEWS, hard confectioner, Langtey place, Commercial-road East, March 2ti, April ::0. Att. Todd, 1 !.a\les' Inn, Holborn. FREDERICK FORD and FREDERICK RILEY BIIOCKLKHURST,stationers, Bow lane, City, Apiil Ii, May 3. ^Att. Jones,Size lane, BucUlei sbury- To Surrender in the Country. GBORGR WILKINSON and JOSEPH WILKINSON, curriers, Ríshop And.lalHI, Durham, April I, May 2, at Ihe Newcaslle-upou 1')n" District Court. Att. Seymour, Newcastle upon Tyne. ROBERT HURST, draper. Newcastle upon Tyne, April I and 30, al (he Newcastle upon Tyne District Court. Att. Ingle'lew, Newcastle upon- Tyne. JOHN COWRN, lineo and woollen draper, Penrith, April 11. May 2, al the Newc3alle upon-T)ne District Courl. All. Cram, Newcastle-upon- Tyne. THEODORE FRI DIIRICK CLARK, <lraper, Scoiland roall, Liverpool, April 3 and 23, at the Manchester District Court. Ails. Sale and W orlhin!:("n, Manchester. HE\RY STEPHENSON HEWITT, licensed victualler, Manchester, April 2 xnd 24, at the Manchester District Court. Atts. Sale and Wortliington, Manchester. THOMAS HODGSON, brick-maker, Gretta bank, Yorkshire, April 11 and v(5, at the District Court of Bankruptcy. All. Sykes, Leeds. THOM AS S HI LLITO. chenlisl, Leeds, April 6, May 2, at the Leedi District Court. Att. Wood, Leeds. EBKNEZKR ROUERS, fire brick manufacturer, Newport, Monmouthshire, April 3, May J, at the Bristol District Court, Att. Hope, Newport. HINTS.—Never quarrel with a lady. ff you are troubled with her, retreat; if she abuse yon, be silent; if she tear your cloak, give her your coat; if she box vonr e;ir% bow to her in return if she tear YOllr eyes oat, feel your way to the door ami-fly. COPPER ORES. Sold at Tun no, March 21s«, 1844. I N I- S. il CtVT. PlMtCttASKKS. PRICE, Tres.ivejn 101 P. G rcntell ami Sons 4"i is o Diuo. mi Ditto ;• „ 0 Ditio S!> Ditto j o Ditto 88 Vivian and Sons and Williams'Foster, and Co. # # ..3150 Ditto 87 P. Grent'ell and Sons 4 4 15 Dhto. 70 Vivian anii Sons 4 1 1; Ditto 48 P. Grentell and Sons .4 7 O "lit" 4:4 Freern.in and Co 7 17 0 Ditto 31 P. Grent'ell and Sons 4 4 (J Poldice 8ti Freeman and Co. T >i ti Dit'o 8.1 Ditto 'r> y Diuo 70 Kns;li«hCopperCo.,&Williams, Foster, ami Co, II 6 '• %• Williams, Foster, aud Co. o L (I ''IUo •• •• 51 Frt'oiu.tn ami Co. A iri <i v>irto. MI Ditto Ditto. 4!t Crown Copper Co., & Williams,*Fo?ter, and Co. «• f! 3 0 Ditto 3!) Williams, Foster, and Co. FI 1<J |) West. Caradon US finnlish Copper Co 8 1 (5 Ditto 78 Williams, Foster, and Co.8 1 11 do Ditto ]0 0 Ditto 40 Vivian and Sons 3 17 G Wh Jewel 101 English Copper Co., & Freeman & Co! -114 O ''it'o •• ti'J rreeman runt Co. >t ..830 Di;to (i'i L.n»li?h Copper Co. 2 0 Ditto. Freeman and Co., and Sims, WiilyamV, Nevi!I, Diuce, and Co. 4 ig (j Par Consols ltct Vivian and SOliS. t-t \I Dillo !H) Ditto.i;; (I Di to t;o Ditto *° r. 1 T rethellan 101 Ditto J -j a Ditto 92 English CopperCo., Fieeman and Co., and Williams,. Foster, and C0.500 Ditt. 55 Freeman&Co., Sims, W'illyanis, IVevill, Diuce^ and Co., and Williams, Foster, and Co. ,4 4 14 () Fowey Consols.. IftS Williams, Foster, and Co. ,5 11 0 Ditto.lot, Sims, Wiliyams, Nevill, Druee.and Co'. 6 5 t! liolmbnsh 90 freeman and Co. P 8 o Ditto SS English CopperCo 5 i.» fi Wh. Bedford H17 English Copper Co., P. G> enfell & Soils', wu 11 anil Williams, Foster,&Co 3 13 G Wh. Maiden 85 feims, Wiliyams, Nevill, Druce, & Co. 4 15 0 T0tal 2,800 Average Produce, 7 £ .—Quantity of tine Copper, 208 tons 3 cwt. 0 nr- Amount ot hale, £ 15,131 7s. Oil.—Average Standard, £ 110 as. Oil.
-:"""'III' METEOROLOGICAL…
-III' METEOROLOGICAL JOURNAL, kept by JOHN JENKINS, Wind-street, Swansea. ■■ n App. Latitude of Observatory 51 37 10 N. Long-it tide 3 55 30 W. Height above Level of ihe Sea 40 feet. BAitomirr I:R II > G ISOM F.TKH TIIKRMOMKTKR. V TOM ATER. I 9 A.M. 3 P.M. 9 A.M. 3 P.M. 9 A.M. I 3 P.M. 9 „3 (Ju»mitjr of J A.M. P.M. Kain. r Temp. Temp. I ) j Pressure. of Pressure. or' Air. Dew Air. Dew Dry. Wei.!Dry. Wei. Min. Max. ID.Tenths. Hun<l, Mer. Mer. i I !| March. I i 19 30-31 43 30-27 45 46 44 46 4.5 47 46 4G 45 36 51 0 0 0 | 20 29 80 44 29-92 40 44 41 48 40 14 44 I 48 47 39 j 51 0 0 2 21 30 22 41 30 22 45 v40 37 4(i 44 36 35 I 44 43 29 51 0 0 „ 5 1 22 29-82 45 29 69 45 48 47 47 4G 50 49 47 47 29 51 0 „ 0 0 1 23 ,78 44 ,78 47 44 43 48 46 46 45 47 46 37 52 0„0 „ 4 I 24 ,61 46 -71 47 18 47 47 44 50 50 I 49 48 37 ,53 0 „ 1 2 | 25 I ,7t 45 ,66 47 46 46 49 48 48 48 1 50 50 j 42 51 0 0 „ 1 j Astronomical Phenomena for the Ensuing Week :— On Monday, 1st, the Slar E. Leonis will be occultated by the Moon. Meantime or immersion at Swansea, 6h. 25m. einmersion, 7b. l'Jiu. P.M. ii High Water in Swansea Harbour and at the Passages FOR TilE HNStHNG WKKK. IS WA.MSKA Hilt Bin: It. THK INSS«(JKS- Morn. Even. Heiyhtu- Mom. Eue./C H. H. a. K, I. H. «. H. «• Saturday March 30 2 57 3 25 12 5 4 IT; 4 4* Smiifay 31 3 54 4 13 14 « 5 14 5 3* Monday April I 4 4'l 5 2 17 0 6 0 6 *2* Tuesday 2 5 23 5 44 19 5 6 43 7 Wednesday 3 B 3 6 23 22 1 7 23 7 43 Thursday 4 6 43 7 0 23 5 8 3 8 20 Friday 5 7 5 1 25 23 4 8 25 1 43 Mood's AGn.— Full Moon, 3d day, Oh. 4tm. morn.
---------------------IWarfeetg.
IWarfeetg. MARK-LANE, LONDON, Monday, March 25.-Tlte weather, having again become damp and unsettled, appears to exercise <"» unfavourable influence over the Grain Trade, more particularly owing to the bad condition of most of the new Wheat. The quali'V is worse than la.ft week, and the Millers have found much difficultif in suiting themselves. At a decline of Is. to -is. per quarter some of the best runs were cleared off, but only a partial progress u-as made with all other sorts at a reduction of 2s. to is per quarter since this day se'nnight. In Foreign IVheat there is a decline of about is. per quarter.—A better demand is experienced for Malting Bar- ley, ana full prices are obtained, but Grinding sorts are the tur cheaper.-Our supplies of Oats continue Untitled bothfrolll Ireland and coastwise, and there is a tolerably fair demand for good qua- lities of seed and horse corn. Upon the whole the prices of this dajf se'nnight are pretty firmly maintained.—Ualt rather cheaper, fJnJ in the Flour trade no further variation. PRICE OF GRAIN.—PAR Imperial Quarter. s. i. t '■ Wheat, Red 50^51 Maple tu •»* Fbie 54 — White 3J White, (new) 52 B, 33 35 Old 52 — Small Beans & F'»e 58 — Old 3* Superfine — — Ticks 2$ Old — — Harrow 31) 3J Rye 23 32 Feed Oat 111 Barley, grinding 27 33 pj„e iff Ditto, line iiinltin< 34 30 Poland al i* Mall 56 58 Fine 22 ,1 Fine .sa —Potato.M Hog Peas 30 31 Fine 21 i* FliOUtt, per Sack of 280 lb. Best 45s. to 50s. I Seconds 40.>vto 45s. PHICR OF SEEDS. N. s. N. tll I'urnip, Swedes, per bush.—to— Clover, Red, per cwt. 50 6.1 Other sorts ltt 18 Flemish 41 Mustard, Brown 15 20 New Hamburg — —— White 10 12 French 42 Canary per quarter 04 05 |Trefoil Rye Grass — — Caraway 48 5i' Tares,winter, per bushel ..6 7 Coriander 15 3' AVERAGE PRICE OF CORN, per Qr. For the Week ending March 10, 18-14, and by which importation is regulated. s. d. s. d. §. rf. Wheat 56 3 Oats .20 I Deans 31 3 Bailey.33 3 Rye .33 S | Peas .31 4 PRICE OF MEAT.—SMITHFIEI.D, March 25. The supply of Beasts was large, and there being but few Butche' in attendance, with an overabundant quantity of meat in the Dea Markets, trade in all descriptions was very bad. On Friday, best Norfolk Scots declined id and this morning even th day's figure (\s.J was only supported for a very few choice one*' 3 s. lurt bring the more general flifurg for prime Beef .—Sheep tferj also in large supply, but there was no animation in lhe trade, 4». lid. i oas only supported for old Downs. In other sorts, ths rat' were not so good, and less business doing.—There were a few Lnrn'1, at market with some inquiry, which also partially operated aqtti" the disposal of Mutton — the price from r>s. o d to 6s ttd. — The'sale Calves was very dull, at a decline of id., the top figure for 'J? ,qitl e f choicest description not exceeding 4s. inrf. The mildness of morning was much against the disposal of Pigs, and there was J* falling off in price, the small dairy-fed not exceeding 4s. 6d. — the whole the market was a very unsatisfactory one for the salesylleil, To sink the olfal— per 81bs. Beef 2s. Wd. to 4s. 0d. Veal 3s. 6 1. to 4s. I"1'* Mutton.. 3s. 4d. to 4s. HI. Pork 3s. Gil. to 4s. NEWGATE and LKADKN HALL..—By the Carcase. Beef. 2s. 0d. lo 3s. 0 Veal. 3s. Od. to 4s. 8' Mutton 2s. 6d. to 3s. 8d. Pork. 2s. 8d. to 4s. 0^, PRICE OF HOPS, in the liorimqh, per Cwt. £ .». £ .» Bast Kent Pockets 0 0/«6 12 Yearling ditto 0 0/tf^ () Ditto Bags 5 15 7 0 Choice — t) q Mid. Kent Pockets (I 0 0 0 1839 bags & pocks. 4 4 0 } Sussex ditto 5 15 0 6 1835, 1836, 1837 & 1838 2 0 PRICE OF TALLOW AND SOAP, per Cwt. rJ. s. d. S. d. S. f Town Tallow 4 1 0 ( Melted Stuff ..31 0 Curd ditto 00 ? Yellow Russia — 0 Ditto Rough 20 0 Palm ■— Ditto Soap 48 0 Yellow Soap — 0 Greaves l-l J! White ditto.. — 0 Mottled ditto.. 52 0 Diegs 5 BRISTOL PRICE CURRENT.— March 22. SUOAU. S. S. COPPIS*. ». ?<I Muse. veryBrown(perc.) —to— Fine ditto '<$ Dry Brown 00 — Very tine 120 J. Middling 01 61 HUM. s. d. 0 Good middlings I 05 07 Jamaica (per gal.) ..2 4 | Good and tine., J 0-i fr2 Leeward Isle ..1 8 j. Molasses 23 t-l I.OGWOOD. jf". e. t) Jamaica (per tOil.) 50 -¡; ø col-Kim. St. Domingo <> 0 4 Jamaica, triage (per cwl.) 60 05 Campeatliy 6 0 JJ 0 Ordinary OS 70 Fustic, Jamaica 5 0 <f Good ditto 72 75 Cuba 8 0 Fine ditto 78 88 oil.. «} Middling 105 115 Gallipoli (per tun) 54 0 linod ditto 120 125 Sicily 50 PRICE OF LEATHER. lb. lb. d. d. lb. lb. d■ fj ,p lii,tes 3 I, 1,: Crop Hides 3Ufo35.. 11 /ol'i German Horse Hides ..l-j Ditto diuo 40 48..12 13 Horse Butts .1' .,1 Ditto ditto 50 00..15 17 Calf Skins, 5J 04..23 Foreign Hides 30 35..In 11 Ditto (common).. ■— —22 Ditto ditto 40 45..10 II Dillo ditto 40 45..lri .fl Bulls, English 10 20..11.^ Dillo diflo 45 50. .,ff Ditto dilto 24 20..15 10 Ditto ditto 80 100..Is .0 Ditto ditto 28 30..15 17 liisli Skins ij Onto ditto(extra; 34 30..15 18 Welsh Skins 27 35..I3 Ditto, Foreign 10 20..13 I I.J Ditto ditto 40 45..1" .,j Ditto ditto 22 25..12 14 Ditto ditto 45 50..21 Ditto ditto 28 30..13 15 Ditto ditto 52 50..22 g Dillo ditto(exti*a;31 30..13 10 Kips, English and Welsh M 19 B. Saddlers' Hides 37 4U..13 14^ Ditio, Petersburg!! 0 8..17 Common ditto 35 40.. 13 I3.J Ditto ditto 9 10.5 -j Shaved Hides 18 2!14 IS) Ditto, Easi India .3 •ihoe ditto 20 23..13 13.} Seal Skins, Large •• |f Common.ditto.— — Ditto, Small >,l Welsh Hides .I2.J 134 Basils .t> |l Bull ditto .10 1'2 |0 English Horse Hides ..12 13 Dillo, Foiei^n jtJ Welsh dilto .II 13 Bellies, English • Spanish ditto .14 vo Ditto, Foreign •• Su. without Butts,—». IlI-S, Od. ea. Printed and Published by WILLIAM COURTENAY MURRAY AND DAVID aE A. No. 58, WIND-STRICT. SWANSEA. SATURDAYMARCH 30, 1844.